The Genuine Relationship Test for Australian Partner Visas: What IMMI Actually Looks For
Most couples come into the partner visa process thinking they need to prove they love each other.
That is not what IMMI is checking.
IMMI is checking whether your relationship looks, on paper, like a real one to a case officer who has never met you, will never meet you, and is reading your documents alongside a stack of fifty other files. They are not judging your love. They are judging whether the documents in your application would convince any reasonable Australian that you and your partner share a life.
That distinction matters because it changes what you should send and how you should frame it. Love letters and wedding photos are weaker evidence than a joint phone bill. A statutory declaration from your partner's mother is weaker than a 12-month lease in both names. The Australian partner visa system was built to reward boring, repeatable, dated paperwork over passion. That is uncomfortable to hear when you are emotionally invested in proving something deeply personal. But once you accept it, the process gets much easier.
This guide walks through what the test actually is, what each of its four pillars asks for, what good evidence looks like in each one, and the five things most failed applications get wrong.
What the test actually is.
The Migration Act 1958 defines a partner relationship two ways:
That is the legal framework. The practical assessment lives in Regulation 1.15A of the Migration Regulations 1994, which tells case officers what to look at when deciding if a relationship is genuine and continuing. Regulation 1.15A gives them four categories to consider:
This is the four-pillar framework. Every partner visa application is assessed against it. Every piece of evidence you send falls into one of those four pillars. And case officers expect to see something solid in each one. A relationship that looks strong on three pillars and empty on the fourth is exactly the shape of an application that draws follow-up requests, delays, and sometimes refusal.
Let's walk through each pillar with what good evidence actually looks like.
Financial aspects.
What IMMI is asking: do you treat your money like a couple, or like two people who happen to share an address?
This is the pillar most couples score lowest on, because young couples often keep money separate for practical reasons. The case officer does not need you to merge everything. They need to see that you have built financial entanglement of some kind.
What good looks like.
- A joint bank account with regular activity from both sides. Not opened a week before lodgement. Ideally six months or more of statements showing actual flow from both partners.
- Shared major expenses with documentation. A rental bond in both names. A mortgage in both names. Joint insurance policies (health, car, home, contents). Utilities (electricity, gas, internet) in both names or in one name with the other clearly listed as resident.
- Joint financial obligations. A car loan in both names. A shared credit card. A joint phone plan with both lines.
- Treating each other as financial dependants. Joint tax declarations of dependant status. One of you listed as superannuation beneficiary on the other's super fund. One of you nominated as next-of-kin on insurance.
- Money flowing between you that looks like shared life. Regular transfers between accounts that align with rent, groceries, bills. Even if you keep your main accounts separate.
What weak looks like.
- A joint account opened two weeks before lodgement with $200 in it and no transactions.
- A single shared streaming subscription as your only financial evidence.
- "We split everything 50/50" stated in a declaration with no supporting documents.
- Bank statements that show the joint account exists but no actual financial life happening in it.
Nature of the household.
What IMMI is asking: do you actually live together as partners, or as housemates, or not really together at all?
This pillar is often the easiest to satisfy and the hardest to fake. Case officers read household evidence carefully because it is the pillar that exposes relationships of convenience.
What good looks like.
- A lease in both names, or a mortgage in both names. Dated, signed, current.
- Bills addressed to both of you at the same address over time. The longer the history of joint bills, the stronger.
- Mail delivered to both of you at the same address from independent sources: banks, government departments, doctors, employers. Multiple senders is more convincing than five letters from the same bank.
- Photos of the home you share, ideally with both your belongings visible (your work setup next to their hobby gear, their kid's drawings on your fridge, both your toothbrushes in the bathroom).
- A statement of how household responsibilities are divided. Who cooks, who cleans, who deals with the garden, who looks after the pet. This goes in your written relationship statement.
What weak looks like.
- Six bills addressed to one of you at the shared address, none to the other.
- A lease that names only one of you, with the other added as "occupant" or with no documented arrangement at all.
- A statutory declaration from your partner saying you live together, with no documentary support.
- All your shared-household evidence dated in the three months before lodgement.
Social aspects.
What IMMI is asking: do the people in your lives know you as a couple, and do you behave as a couple in public?
What good looks like.
- Photos at events with friends, family, colleagues. Not posed studio shots. Real moments. Dated where possible. A spread across years if you have been together a while.
- Joint invitations. Wedding invites addressed to both of you. Christmas cards from family addressed to "you and Sarah." Joint dinner-party invites. Joint baby shower invites.
- Joint travel. Booking confirmations, boarding passes, accommodation in both names. Holidays together. Visits to each other's families.
- Joint activities. Memberships to gyms, clubs, hobby groups in both your names. A photo at the same event year after year.
- Statutory declarations from people who know you both as a couple. This is what Form 888 is for, and it is its own section below.
- Social media that documents the relationship. Tagged photos, joint posts, your partner appearing in your feed regularly over time. Not curated for the application. Real history.
What weak looks like.
- Twenty selfies of the two of you in the same coffee shop.
- Ten Form 888 declarations all from people in one circle (all your partner's family, or all your friends).
- Social media that only shows the two of you together starting six months before lodgement.
- No evidence at all of you appearing in each other's family or friend circles.
Nature of commitment.
What IMMI is asking: have you organised your life as if this person is your partner, and do you both intend it to continue?
This is the pillar that holds your written relationship statement, your stated future plans, and the legal and administrative steps you have taken to recognise each other.
What good looks like.
- A relationship statement from each of you. Written in your own voices, not by a migration agent. Covering how you met, how the relationship developed, key milestones, your current life together, and your plans for the future.
- Wills naming each other as beneficiary or executor.
- Powers of attorney naming each other.
- Next-of-kin and emergency contact designations on workplace records, medical records, school records (for children of the relationship).
- Joint legal or financial arrangements. A joint business, joint property ownership, joint guardianship documents.
- Long-term plans documented in some form: a savings goal, a house deposit account, written future plans you can show case officers.
- Knowledge of each other's family demonstrated through specific evidence: trips taken to meet family, family events attended, photos with each other's parents and siblings.
What weak looks like.
- Two declarations that read like they were written from the same template, sentence by sentence.
- A statement of commitment with no specifics. "We love each other and intend to spend our lives together" without any of the details that make a real relationship visible.
- No legal or administrative recognition of each other at all.
What "genuine and continuing" really means.
The Migration Regulations use the phrase "genuine and continuing." Two words doing real work.
The combination matters in two practical ways. First, your evidence should cover the full span of your relationship, not just a snapshot. A case officer reading 12 months of joint bills, photos across multiple events over two years, and travel records spanning the relationship sees a continuing relationship. A case officer reading a folder of evidence all dated in the three months before lodgement sees a snapshot, which raises the question of whether the relationship was a relationship before you needed it to be one.
Second, things can change between the temporary and permanent stages. If you separate during the wait, your eligibility for the permanent visa generally ends, with exceptions for family violence and for sponsor death. If you have a child during the wait, that strengthens the application for the permanent stage. The two-year reassessment is real, and the "continuing" element is what gets checked.
The five things that fail most applications.
These are the patterns case officers see over and over. Each one is fixable before you lodge.
Common situations and how the rules treat people in them.
We cannot tell you whether your specific evidence is strong enough. Here is how the rules treat people in common shapes.
A couple who have lived together 18 months in Australia, two joint accounts, one shared lease, plenty of social evidence
Pillar one (financial), two (household), and three (social) are well covered. The application is in a strong position so long as pillar four (commitment) includes thoughtful relationship statements from each partner and at least some legal recognition (joint emergency contacts, wills if you have them, etc.). The common gap for couples in this shape is overconfidence in pillar four leading to thin written statements.
A couple who have been together 8 months, just moved in together, planning to apply soon
The de facto 12-month rule applies. Either marry and avoid the rule entirely, or register the relationship with a state or territory (NSW, Vic, Qld, SA, ACT, Tas all have registries; WA and NT do not), or wait until you cross the 12-month mark. Without one of those, the application will not satisfy the de facto definition.
A long-distance couple where the applicant is in their home country and the Australian sponsor is in Australia
Pillar two (household) is the hard one. The relationship has to show ongoing presence in each other's lives across distance: regular visits documented, video calls, plans to live together once the visa is granted. The relationship statement carries more weight here because the documentary evidence on cohabitation is necessarily thinner. Couples in this shape often apply through the 309 offshore path, which suits the geography.
A couple where one partner has a child from a previous relationship and that child is part of the household
The child's presence strengthens the application, both as evidence of a real family unit and through the best-interests-of-the-child consideration that runs through Australian immigration law. Make the child visible in the evidence: school enrolment documents naming both partners as contacts, photos of family life, the child mentioned in both relationship statements as part of the household. The strongest commitment evidence often comes from how a couple parents together.
A couple who recently registered their relationship and want to apply quickly
Registration waives the 12-month de facto rule, so you can apply as soon as the registration is effective. The application will still need to show a genuine and continuing relationship across all four pillars. Registration is not a substitute for evidence; it is a way to clear the 12-month threshold.
These are scenarios, not recommendations.
Frequently asked.
What does Section 5CB of the Migration Act require?
Section 5CB defines a de facto partner. The relationship must be genuine and continuing, the two people must have a mutual commitment to a shared life to the exclusion of all others, and they must live together or not live separately on a permanent basis. For most applicants, the de facto relationship must have existed for at least 12 months before applying, unless the relationship is registered with an Australian state or territory or there are compelling circumstances.
How much evidence do I need for an Australian partner visa?
There is no fixed amount. IMMI looks for evidence across four pillars: financial, household, social, and commitment. A strong application typically includes 20 to 40 documents covering all four pillars, plus a written relationship statement from each partner and at least two Form 888 declarations from people who know you as a couple. Quality matters more than quantity. A case officer would rather see five strong documents in each pillar than fifty weak ones.
What is Form 888 and who can fill it in?
Form 888 ('Supporting statement in relation to a Partner or Prospective Marriage visa application') is the standard witness statement form used in partner visa applications. The declarant must be 18 or over, an Australian citizen or permanent resident, and must personally know both members of the couple. The form must be witnessed by a person authorised to witness statutory declarations under the Statutory Declarations Act 1959 (JPs, doctors, lawyers, pharmacists, teachers, police officers, and many others). Important exception: applicants who do not hold a substantive visa at the time of application (Schedule 3 applicants) cannot use Form 888. IMMI requires Commonwealth Statutory Declarations from the Attorney-General's Department instead.
Do we need to be married to apply for a partner visa?
No. You can apply as a married couple or as de facto partners. Married applicants do not need to satisfy the 12-month cohabitation rule that applies to de facto couples. Married applicants still need to show the relationship is genuine and continuing across the four pillars. Marriage is not by itself proof of a genuine relationship.
Can I register my relationship to skip the 12-month de facto rule?
Yes, in most Australian states and territories. NSW, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, the ACT, and Tasmania all have relationship registries that recognise de facto relationships. Registration with one of these waives the 12-month cohabitation rule under regulation 2.03A. Western Australia and the Northern Territory do not have registries, so couples in those states cannot use this pathway.
What is the difference between the four pillars of relationship evidence?
The four pillars are listed in Regulation 1.15A of the Migration Regulations. Financial aspects look at whether you share economic life (joint accounts, shared bills, financial dependency). Nature of the household looks at whether you actually live together and how you divide household responsibilities. Social aspects look at whether you are known to your communities as a couple. Nature of commitment looks at long-term legal and personal recognition of each other (wills, next-of-kin, future plans).
How long should our relationship statements be?
Each partner should write 800 to 1,500 words in their own voice. Shorter than that often feels thin to case officers. Longer than that loses their attention. The strongest statements include specifics about how you met, how the relationship developed, the everyday rhythm of your current life, difficulties you have weathered together, and your plans for the future.
What if our evidence is mostly from the last few months before applying?
That is a known weakness. Case officers look at evidence dates. A strong application has evidence dated across the full span of the relationship, not just the period before lodgement. If your strong documentary evidence is recent, supplement it with the older evidence you do have (older photos, older text message exchanges, older travel records) and address the timeline in your relationship statement.
Does IMMI re-check our relationship at the permanent stage?
Yes. The permanent stage (801 onshore or 100 offshore) is assessed two years after the original lodgement, and IMMI reviews whether the relationship is still genuine and continuing at that point. You will need to provide updated relationship evidence, fresh police certificates, and any changes to your household or family circumstances. Most permanent stages are granted relatively smoothly when the relationship is still ongoing and the documentation is current.
The decision frame in one paragraph.
The four pillars are not a checklist; they are a portrait. A case officer wants to look at your application and see a couple, not a stack of documents. The strongest applications have something solid in each pillar, evidence dated across the full span of the relationship, Form 888 declarations from a mix of people across both sides, and relationship statements written in each partner's own voice that include the specifics nobody else could tell. The weakest applications are heavy in one pillar, thin in another, dated entirely in the three months before lodgement, and read like they were written by the same person twice. Most of the difference between strong and weak applications is not the depth of the relationship. It is how the couple chose to document it.
This is general information about how IMMI assesses partner visa relationships. It is not advice on whether your evidence is sufficient. For advice on your situation, find a registered migration agent. For the related decision about whether to apply onshore or offshore, see our 820 vs 309 comparison guide.
General information about how IMMI assesses partner visa relationships, not advice on your relationship or your evidence. For advice on your situation, find a registered migration agent at mara.gov.au.